Nothing to report, so the live row does not draw and the field is the whole bar. The voice switch beside the mic draws when [tts] enabled is set; a click turns the agent's voice on, a second click turns it off. The count beside the icon is the room: two other clients are listening while this one's switch is off, and the title names it.

off (a struck speaker), on (a plain one), a reply sounding (the mark), and the room when a second client listens. The line beside it is the switch's own refusal, a send on a dropped socket.

the socket is down, so that was not sent

The row leads with the turn's own figures, every field the wire carries, in the strip's order. A field the record does not carry is dropped, never drawn as a zero or a dash.

The send joins the row; the keys are a pointer's detail on the same line and stand down under a finger.

The field grows; the live row does not.

One bar, expanded. The question takes the field's slot and the words row is the answer's own input; the reader's draft sits on the row and swaps the field in with one click.

The boxes are the toggled set; the submit key says how many will go, so a set is never sent unseen.

The reader folded it; one click unfolds. The live row still says what waits.

Question, permission, held post, document hand-off, browser hand-off, terminal hand-off, a held vault call and a held configuration write: one line each, the kind's mark leading.

A held write shows every key it would change and both values verbatim, because the reader approves the edit itself rather than a summary of it. A section's mutually required pair is one card: one save, one approval.

A locked card cannot name the item - naming it needs the keys - so it draws the id, the masked diff and an attachment's name, then the masked master-password field and the optional 2FA code. Approve waits, drawn unavailable, until the password is entered. The draft carries no secret value; the password rides only the approval.

Where the device holds an enrolment, the gesture is the card's primary action and Enter runs it; the master password is one link beneath it, so a broken sensor is a working path away. The approve verb is the gesture itself, and the unlock material it releases rides only the approval.

A refused gesture never settles the call: the card stands, says the platform's own reason under the button, and the password it offers is the same link as before. Only a release that succeeds sends the approval.

While the OS prompt is up the button says what the card is waiting for and cannot be pressed twice; the row's other verbs stay as they were. The state ends when the gesture does.

The subject is drawn exactly as it arrives; the approving action leads and the refusal sits last.

The subject arrives verbatim and the reason is the CLI's own line. The approving action leads.

The words that would go out, with each mention drawn as the name the core resolved; the approving verb leads, the send-back sits between it and the refusal. The thread is named by its parent's author and opening words, and the people the draft tags are their names - the timestamp and the raw ids are gone.

Enter sends, Shift+Enter is a newline, Escape closes; the verb is unavailable until the field has words. The mic dictates into this box, and so does the push-to-talk key while the field holds the caret; while a take runs its card replaces the field, and the card's way out abandons the take. This draft is a root message, so no thread segment is drawn and the verb says Post to Slack.

The same held-draft card, worded for what it would do: a delete asks to delete, and its refusal is "keep it". The stamp's noun follows the operation, so the segment names the message it acts on, not a thread.

The refusal draws on the folded bar too: a fold never hides why an answer was rejected.

The field in the body, the ask kept mounted and hidden behind it, and the ask's chip still on the row to bring it back.

Every door in one place: the chips the row could not hold, kept mounted and listed in the row's own order, each opening its own panel.

The chips keep their fixed order and take their tone in place: the review answer in the accent, a failed process in red. A tone is not a promotion; the row never reorders under the reader.

The take goes with its row, the field comes back with the words at the caret, and the ring takes one green beat.

The words land and the row says the take was cut, so the reader knows part of what they said is missing rather than that they stopped speaking.

The line names the cause above the take's own row, and goes the moment a sample lands.

The field comes back with the notice above it, no recording band and no stop control: the take produced no words, so the reader knows to re-speak.

The seat's first page is still out. It holds the body like every other narrative state: nothing can be typed until the page lands, so the line takes the box rather than sitting above a live field.

Measured in the app at 430 with a coarse pointer: 121px, the row's chips 44px and the field's controls 44px. The figures give way first - the row clips them rather than the +N - so every chip stays one door away.